Why You May Need a Social Licence to Operate – And How to Get It
Reaching New Heights With Sustainability
Australia's Largest Waste to Fuel Plant Opens in Sydney
What Happens to Queensland's Site after Commonwealth Games?
Taking Sustainable Building Beyond Design
How Technology is Changing Construction
The Future of Modular
Melbourne's Docklands: Transformation Underway
By Procore Editorial staff
May 22, 2017
As the complexity of construction projects continues to increase, so does the demand placed on contractors–owners expect more, regulations continue to expand, skilled labor is harder to come by,and risk is harder to allocate.
How can anyone keep up?
It’s all about how you plan.
To be successful, today’s construction professional must balance the management of safety, quality, and productivity on the job site. For decades, studies have shown tangible links between these three elements, yet the industry has only recently begun to embrace the concept that we cannot neglect one of these facets without having a negative impact on the others.
Consider a recent fatality of a concrete worker performing finish patching on a length of cast-in place concrete wall. The wall was not extremely tall and an extension ladder was selected to provide safe access to the upper areas that needed to be patched.
If the task is further scrutinized, the choice of a ladder seems like a questionable way to perform patch work along the entire length of the wall. When working from a ladder, the safe reach of the worker from side to side is extremely limited, giving him a few options:
In this case, after working at this task for several days,the worker unfortunately reached too far and fell while positioned less than 10 feet up the ladder.
An analysis of the circumstances in this example begins to reveal the complex relationship between safety, quality, and productivity. As the worker’s focus jumps from one element to the other in an attempt to compensate and keep the three elements in balance,he is forced to make constant decisions about which element to favor at any given point in time.
Unfortunately, if a pre-task analysis does not include all three elements in the planning stages,it is very difficult to keep them balanced once you are entrenched in the work. Asking an employee to continuously undertake this decision-making process invites disaster as that employee may not be equipped to make the right decisions nor should he or she be expected to.
The solution calls for rethinking what many of us know as our JHA (Job Hazard Analysis) process.
Over the years, as the importance of safety and health management began to emerge as an element to be considered in the execution of our work, the industry largely responded with an “add-on” approach.
We added the position of “safety manager” to the job site roster. They quickly became known as the“safety cops,” roaming the job site looking for unsafe acts or conditions, their reputation declining. As this approach has progressed, it’s begun to reach its limit and is no longer an effective method.
Next, some progressive companies added on the use of a Safety and Health Management System. These programs, also known as Injury and Illness PreventionPrograms, (or I2P2), seek to implement a proactive approach to workplace safety. A common component of these programs includes the performance of a JHA.
Many companies assign the duty of Job Hazard Analysis to their safety manger. In some cases, the project manager or super sends the information and plan of attack to the safety manager. In other cases,the plan is established and the crew leader is asked to perform a hazard analysis on that plan, in the field,each morning before starting the work.
As a stand-alone solution to safety and health management on a construction site, this JHA process is still a flawed approach–only addressing safety as an after thought.
To be successful, the industry needs to abandon the “add-on” approach and start considering safety and health asa fundamental part of the planning and execution processes.
A successful task analysis approach will examine an activity at the planning stage and take all three elements (safety, productivity, quality) into account to arrive at a well-balanced method for completing the work. This removes the responsibility of the field personnel to continually evaluate their work and choose between these elements.
Every job is different.
While some contractors perform very similar types of projects and can reuse many of their task plans, it’s important to acknowledge that conditions on projects are variable and ever changing.
That means we need to continually ask ourselves “Does this previously completed task analysis represent the conditions on this job?”
If a task is typically completed using a scissor lift to reach an elevated work area, for example, but this site does not have a flat or level surface below the work area, work will likely commence with the wrong piece of equipment on site. This leaves the crew leader faced with the task of deciding: “Do I give it a try so we can get it done? Maybe we can create a level surface ourselves. Or do I have everyone wait while we get a different piece of equipment delivered?”
A successful task analysis will also recognize that field personnel often have a more intimate knowledge-base of how conditions will actually present themselves in the field or, at the very least, they may have a different perspective on the activity. These are the people that will be tasked with performing the work and it’s important to have their buy-in on the resulting process.Not only does this increase the chance for success, but it also presents an opportunity to discuss expectations and specific procedures to be followed when things don’t go according to plan.Although this may seem like added work, the process of conducting an initial task analysis pays off in the long run. As crews arrive on site with a workable plan, they’re able to focus on the job at hand and get the work done much more efficiently.
Download the rest of the free eBook, "The 3 Major Qualities of a Successful Task-Analysis Approach" to discover how quality, safety, and productivity can help you stand out from the competition.
Project Management Guide Part 1: Planning
When a Safety Program Isn't Enough: Why Culture is Everything
Planning for the Worst Sets You Up for the Best
The Anatomy of a Request for Information (RFI)
The widest used rating system for green building is Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). It’s no surprise, then, that major U.... Read More
July 1, 2018
Hear Brad Hyatt, Associate Professor at California State University Fresno, discuss what students are learning in school to prepare them for const... Read More
Budget. Schedule. Quality. The trifecta of a project. But balancing that trifecta isn't easy to do. Our webinar, led by construction industry exper... Read More
Building in the "Big Easy" sometimes isn't. The challenges faced by Landis Construction aren't often understood by out-of-towners, because when it'... Read More
Estimating mistakes cost contractors plenty. And, with the demand from customers for estimates on-the-fly, the chances of missing the mark increase... Read More
In all big construction projects, time is money, and few projects drag along as painfully slow as high-rise buildings. A new method of construction... Read More
June 25, 2018
Improving safety and efficiency on projects is an important consideration for any construction company, and to that end, some are turning to unmann... Read More