States face flooding, other problems in Midwest amid storms
U.S. Home Construction Jumps Nearly 10 Percent in January
Trump's Plan to Rebuild US Roads Relies on Local Dollars
How OSHA Is Trying to Catch Up
Automation in the Construction Industry
Weekly Grind: Biggest Construction Award Winners and New Equipment to Hit the Market
Smart Buildings Continue Their Rise in 2018
Friday Funny: The Productivity Placebo
By Willow Aliento
September 25, 2017
The Australian Institute of Building Surveyors is calling for an urgent and nation-wide overhaul of building regulations, and a national body to be responsible for ensuring products are compliant with Australian standards.
Last week it released a comprehensive policy paper, Building Regulatory Reform in Australia, the outlines what the association sees as the key components required to modernise and harmonise the rulebooks.
The AIBS is proposing a single, dedicated Building Act consistent across all States and Territories, with responsibility for policy formulation and administration of the regulations to be separated.
AIBS President, Timothy Tuxford, said the policy sets out the foundations for a building regulatory system that could support effective operations in all phases of construction of all types of buildings.
“The building industry has changed dramatically worldwide, but as the Senate Inquiry into Non Conforming Building Products has found, there are systemic issues that need to be addressed urgently,” he said.
Mr Tuxford said that measures to reduce red tape and the nation entering into free trade agreements have led to a greater variety of construction products in the marketplace, however, the regulatory system has not kept up with these and other changes.
The policy makes a strong call for uniform national rules, instead of the current situation where they are different for each state and territory. There are also “ambiguities” in the National Construction Code, Mr Tuxford said, and a lack of oversight and auditing. In addition, there is currently no mechanism for checking whether building products arriving on site are properly certified to Australian standards, and there is limited protection for consumers.
“We also need a system of regulations that is more transparent and easily understood by professionals working in the industry and by the general public,” he said.
Issues of building failure due to non-conforming products could be “the canary in the mine”.
“While it is unfair to compare Australia’s building stock to the Grenfell Tower, we cannot wait for a catastrophic building failure before we decide to improve our building regulatory system here,” Mr Tuxford said.
“Since problems with non-conforming products emerged, we have seen plenty of people criticise the regulations and other professionals working with them and, while some have put forward suggestions for fixing part of the system, we haven’t seen anyone come up with a practical solution for the whole of the system throughout Australia. “
To address the products issue, AIBS will be pushing for the establishment of a national body to be responsible for technical data on all building products, including testing of all products for compliance with Australian Standards, and for the results to be made publicly available.
The policy also calls for national accreditation and registration of industry professionals, and national licensing for industry practitioners.
In addition, on site and random audits of work being carried out should be undertaken by dedicated building regulators or authorised audit bodies. Critical stage inspections should also become mandatory to ensure building work is compliant.
There is also a suggestion that there should be for ongoing post occupation inspections to confirm compliance with maintenance requirements, including safety provisions.
“The policy is ambitious and achieving all of the objectives in it will be challenging but if we do not aspire to the highest standards, we will never achieve best practice in our building industry in Australia,” Mr Tuxford said.
Construction Union Supports Flammable Cladding Ban
Ever wonder what’s the difference between a general contractor and construction manager? Well, you’re not alone! To help clear up any confusion, we’ve broken down the roles and responsibilities of ... Read More
If you're a construction worker, you're most likely working physical labor and it can get hot if you're working under the sun. Here's a guide for h... Read More
Pete says that Procore quickly breaks down the complicated pieces of data in his jobs, and presents them to the end user in a digestible format. "T... Read More
Hear Brad Hyatt, Associate Professor at California State University Fresno, discuss what students are learning in school to prepare them for const... Read More
Construction has always had a somewhat complicated relationship with technology. Over the last few decades there have been improvements in material... Read More
J. Colin Cagney, a director, KPMG Major Projects Advisory, knows that while most companies want to use data analytics to increase, they’re often no... Read More
Congress has passed the final version of the federal tax reform bill, and it will soon head to President Donald Trump to be signed into law. The qu... Read More
January 9, 2018